2019 (1) TMI 2

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sion stage itself. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved against the orders of assessment dated 25.10.2018 & 26.10.2018 passed in respect of assessment years 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. 3. The main ground of challenge in these writ petitions is that the Assessing Officer has chosen to pass the impugned orders solely guided by the report submitted by the Enforcement Wing Officials, without considering any of the objections raised by the petitioner to the notices of proposal. Thus, it is contended that the failure to consider the objections resulted in violation of principles of natural justice. It is further contended that the Assessing Officer also failed to give an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. However, he has not chosen to give his finding as to how those objections are not sustainable. On the other hand, he has concluded the assessment only on the reason that the assessee has duly admitted the alleged purchase omission and agreed to pay the tax at the time of inspection. Therefore, the Assessing Officer has brushed aside the objections as an after thought. Needless to state that the Assessing Officer, being a quasi judicial authority has to exercise his power, with independent application of mind on the facts and circumstances, uninfluenced by any of the instructions or directions issued by the higher authorities or the report made by the Inspecting Officials. No doubt, such report of the Inspecting Officials may be the mater....