<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372837</link>
    <description>Assessment orders were held unsustainable where the Assessing Officer failed to independently consider the assessee&#039;s detailed objections and merely reproduced them without reasoned findings. The Court held that an inspection report and an alleged admission during inspection cannot be treated as conclusive without independent application of mind, particularly when liability is disputed. It also found a breach of natural justice because no personal hearing was granted, despite the circular requiring such opportunity, especially where penalty was proposed. The writ petitions were allowed and the matters were remanded for fresh assessment after considering the objections and granting personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 06:36:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372837</link>
      <description>Assessment orders were held unsustainable where the Assessing Officer failed to independently consider the assessee&#039;s detailed objections and merely reproduced them without reasoned findings. The Court held that an inspection report and an alleged admission during inspection cannot be treated as conclusive without independent application of mind, particularly when liability is disputed. It also found a breach of natural justice because no personal hearing was granted, despite the circular requiring such opportunity, especially where penalty was proposed. The writ petitions were allowed and the matters were remanded for fresh assessment after considering the objections and granting personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>