2018 (2) TMI 1814

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. V. K. SHAMSUDHEEN AND SRI. K. DENNY DEVASSY, SC JUDGMENT The first petitioner is a partnership firm. The second petitioner is the Managing Partner of the first petitioner firm. The first petitioner is engaged in undertaking civil works on contract basis. They have undertaken two works of the Kerala State Housing Board (the Board) covered by Exts.P1 and P2 agreements. The first petitioner has executed the work covered by Ext.P1 agreement and a sum of Rs. 5,03,560/- is due to the first petitioner from the Board in connection with the said work. It is stated by the petitioners that in the course of execution of the work covered by Ext.P2 agreement, the first petitioner executed an irrevocable power of attorney in fa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y Ext.P1 agreement, a sum of Rs. 5,03,560/- is payable by the Board to the first petitioner. It is stated that the said amount has not been disbursed to the first petitioner as they have not executed the supplementary agreement required to be executed by them for the extra works carried out by them. It is stated that the Board has no objection in disbursing the balance amount payable in respect of the work covered by Ext.P1 agreement, if the first petitioner executes the supplementary agreement required to be executed by them and produces clearance certificate from the authorities under the Value Added Tax Act, as the said authorities have interdicted further payments by the Board to the first petitioner. As regards the work covered by Ext.....