https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277836 The court directed the Board to transmit the amounts due under the Ext.P1 agreement to the first petitioner for civil works, to be adjusted against amounts payable under Ext.P6 order upon execution of necessary agreements. The court aligned this decision with the settlement of the petitioner's Value Added Tax liability under the Amnesty Scheme. However, the court declined to direct the Board to remit amounts due for work executed by another contractor under Ext.P2 agreement due to an unresolved dispute between the parties. The judgment emphasized the importance of fulfilling legal requirements for payment disbursement. en-us Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Dec 2018 00:40:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277836 The court directed the Board to transmit the amounts due under the Ext.P1 agreement to the first petitioner for civil works, to be adjusted against amounts payable under Ext.P6 order upon execution of necessary agreements. The court aligned this decision with the settlement of the petitioner's Value Added Tax liability under the Amnesty Scheme. However, the court declined to direct the Board to remit amounts due for work executed by another contractor under Ext.P2 agreement due to an unresolved dispute between the parties. The judgment emphasized the importance of fulfilling legal requirements for payment disbursement. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277836