2018 (11) TMI 1509

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cial) Shri. Ajay Kumar, Addl. Comm. (AR) for Appellant Shri. Gajendra Jain, Advocate for respondent ORDER Per: C.J. Mathew 1. We dispose off four appeals of Revenue against order-in-appeal no.YG/111 to 122/Th-I/08 dated 6th October 2008 of Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai, which has been decided in favour of M/s Shree New India Processors and M/s Navbharat Industries....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....429/-, of Rs. 10,42,240/-, of Rs. 9,63,266/-, of Rs. 18,09,053/- and of Rs. 16,34,829/-. Likewise, M/s Shree New India Processors were issued with a single show-cause notice for recovery of Rs. 4,70,460/- and of Rs. 3,94,164/-. 3. We have heard the Learned Counsel for the respondents and Learned Authorised Representative. 4. It is seen that the proceedings against M/s Shree New India Process....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ars to have combined all those. Nevertheless, the first appellate authority has assigned separate number for each order-in-appeal corresponding to each show-cause notice. Consequently, notwithstanding the convention that permits Revenue to file common appeal, each of the numbered appeals must be dealt with separately. Accordingly, in disposing off these separate appeals, we find that the litigatio....