<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1509 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371166</link>
    <description>Revenue appeals were held not maintainable because each dispute involved a demand below the monetary threshold prescribed by the applicable litigation policy. The Tribunal considered each appeal separately and applied the prevailing, amended policy to the individual demands, finding that the filing and pursuit limits had not been crossed in any case. The appeals were accordingly dismissed, and the merits of the duty dispute were left unexamined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:21:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1509 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371166</link>
      <description>Revenue appeals were held not maintainable because each dispute involved a demand below the monetary threshold prescribed by the applicable litigation policy. The Tribunal considered each appeal separately and applied the prevailing, amended policy to the individual demands, finding that the filing and pursuit limits had not been crossed in any case. The appeals were accordingly dismissed, and the merits of the duty dispute were left unexamined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>