2018 (10) TMI 885

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.   P.C: This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges an order dated 11th October, 2017 passed under Section 23 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax, 2002 (the MVAT Act), by the Sales Tax Officer Respondent No.3. The impugned order dated 11th October, 2017, relates to assessment for Financial Year 201112 in respect of VAT under the MVAT....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ugned order dated 11th October, 2017 has considered the communication written by the Assessee - wherein it is submitted that despatch proof is only required in case of interstate Sale and not for intrastate Sale. Thus, in this case, it was contended by the Petitioner that, absence of despatch proof, cannot lead to the conclusion that the goods have not been received. Thus, the impugned order, on a....