https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368919 A writ challenge to an assessment order under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act was declined because the dispute depended on factual questions about actual receipt of goods and the sufficiency of supporting evidence. The assessing authority had considered the assessee's explanation but treated the purchases as not genuine for want of proof. In these circumstances, the appellate authority was the proper forum to examine the evidence, and the availability of an efficacious alternate remedy weighed against the exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The petitioner was therefore left to pursue the statutory appeal. en-us Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:41:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368919 A writ challenge to an assessment order under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act was declined because the dispute depended on factual questions about actual receipt of goods and the sufficiency of supporting evidence. The assessing authority had considered the assessee's explanation but treated the purchases as not genuine for want of proof. In these circumstances, the appellate authority was the proper forum to examine the evidence, and the availability of an efficacious alternate remedy weighed against the exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The petitioner was therefore left to pursue the statutory appeal. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368919