Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (10) TMI 709

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ns. The petitioner was issued advance authorisations under the extant Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20. The petitioner contends that the prevailing exemptions under the custom notifications, could not have been denied merely on the premise of the introduction of a new levy under the Goods and Service Tax with effect from 01.07.2017. This Court had while entertaining these proceedings made an interim order on 11.10.2017 in the following terms : "1. Notice. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, the learned CGSC, accepts notice for the Respondents. He has placed before W.P.(C) 8677/2017 Page 1 of 4 the Court a Press Release issued by the Ministry of Finance dated 6th October 2017 setting out the relief package announced for exporters by the Goods and Se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....robability the notification will be issued in the immediate future. 3. Mr. Handoo, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, states that notwithstanding the above relief measures announced by the GST Council on 6th October 2017, the situation on the ground remains the same. He has produced before the Court a copy of an e-challan showing payment of IGST to the tune of Rs. 58,58,345/- by the Petitioner in respect of Bill of Entry dated 10th October 2017 for import of gold bars from Abu Dhabi. He submits that the Petitioner was not permitted to clear the goods without such payment and that the Petitioner's protest to the authorities was to no avail. 4. The Court directs the Petitioner to place the above facts on an af....