<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 709 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368743</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to verify if the petitioner fulfilled export obligations when the exemption existed during license issuance. If verified, no action was needed; if not, assessment was required. The respondent was given four months to complete verification and take necessary actions, with proper notice to the petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of under these terms, and the pending application was resolved accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 709 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368743</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to verify if the petitioner fulfilled export obligations when the exemption existed during license issuance. If verified, no action was needed; if not, assessment was required. The respondent was given four months to complete verification and take necessary actions, with proper notice to the petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of under these terms, and the pending application was resolved accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>