TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2018 (9) TMI 1678
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the time of import and the goods were accordingly cleared by the Proper Officer of Customs, for home consumption. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the benefits already granted through the Notification No.46 of 2011 had been withdrawn mistakenly. Thus, the petitioner is constrained to move the present writ petition. 4.It is contended that withdrawal of the exemption granted is improper and not in accordance with the agreements entered into between the Countries. Thus, the benefits already granted is to be extended to the writ petitioner in respect of grant of concessional rate of basic customs duty. 5.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents opposed the contention by stating that the concessional rate of basic customs duty initially granted under the Notification No.46 of 2011 was withdrawn by way of a decision and not by mistake. Thus, the writ petitioner is not eligible for the concession as such claimed in the present writ petition. 6.The learned counsel for the respondents further urged this Court by stating that the writ petitioner is bound to exhaust the statutory remedies available under the provisions of the Customs Act. It is state....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cising the powers of judicial review in the matter of dispensing with the appeal remedy provided for an aggrieved person under a statute. If the High Courts started interfering with such Appellate powers without any valid and substantiated reasons, then the very purpose and object of the statute and provision of appeal under the statute became an empty formality and the High Courts also should see that the provisions of appeal contemplated under the statutes are implemented in its real spirit and in accordance with the procedures contemplated under the rules constituted thereon. While entertaining a writ petition as narrated by the Apex Court, the provision of efficacious alternative remedy under the statute also to be considered. If the writ petitions are entertained in a routine manner, by not allowing the competent Appellate authority to exercise their powers under the provisions of the statute, then this Court is of an opinion that the power of judicial review has not exercised in a proper manner. Thus, it is necessary for this Court to elaborate the legal principle settled in respect of the separation of powers under the Constitution of India. 1. Madras Bar Association vs. U....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rine of separation of powers informs the Indian constitutional structure and it is an essential constituent of rule of law. In other words, the doctrine of separation of power though not expressly engrafted in the Constitution, its sweep, operation and visibility are apparent from the scheme of Indian Constitution. Constitution has made demarcation, without drawing formal lines between the three organs- legislature, executive and judiciary. In that sense, even in the absence of express provision for separation of power, the separation of power between legislature, executive and judiciary is not different from the constitutions of the countries which contain express provision for separation of powers. (ii) Independence of courts from the executive and legislature is fundamental to the rule of law and one of the basic tenets of Indian Constitution. Separation of judicial power is a significant constitutional principle under the Constitution of India. (iii) Separation of powers between three organs--legislature, executive and judiciary--is also nothing but a consequence of principles of equality enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, breach of separ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Thus, the institutional functions and exhausting the appeal remedies by the aggrieved persons, are to be enforced in all circumstances and writ proceedings can be entertained only on exceptional circumstances. Rule is to prefer an appeal and entertaining a writ is only an exception. This being the legal principles to be followed, this Court cannot entertain the writ petitions in a routine manner by waiving the remedy of appeal provided under the statute. 12.Now, let us look into the legal principles settled by the Apex Court for exhausting the efficacious alternative remedy provided under the statute. 13.When an effective alternative remedy is available, a writ petition cannot be maintained 1. In City and Industrial Development Corporation v. DosuAardeshirBhiwandiwala and Ors. MANU/SC/8250/2008 : (2009) 1 SCC 168, this Court had observed that: The Court while exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 is duty-bound to consider whether: (a) adjudication of writ petition involves any complex and disputed questions of facts and whether they can be satisfactorily resolved; (b) the petition reveals all material facts; (c) the Petitioner has any alternative or effective re....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s available to the Respondent. The interim order was passed on the very first date, without an opportunity to the Appellant to file a reply. Reliance was placed on United Bank of India vs. Satyawati Tandon and others, 2010 (8) SCC 110, and General Manager, Sri Siddeshwara Cooperative Bank Limited and another vs. Ikbal and others, 2013 (10) SCC 83. The writ petition ought to have been dismissed at the threshold on the ground of maintainability. The Division Bench erred in declining to interfere with the same. The Supreme Court agreed to the arguments and held the same also noted that the writ petition ought not to have been entertained and the interim order granted for the mere asking without assigning special reasons, and that too without even granting opportunity to the Appellant to contest the maintainability of the writ petition and failure to notice the subsequent developments in the interregnum. 5. State of Himachal Pradesh v. Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. reported at AIR 2005 SC 3856, the Supreme Court explained the rule of 'alternate remedy' in the following terms Considering the plea regarding alternative remedy as raised by the appellant-State. Except for a perio....