https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367942 The High Court held that the petitioner's request for continuation of a concessional rate of basic customs duty under Notification No. 46/2011 was not eligible as the withdrawal was deliberate, not a mistake. The court emphasized the need for the petitioner to exhaust statutory remedies under the Customs Act, directing them to approach the Appellate Tribunal for adjudication. Stressing the importance of separation of powers, the court dismissed the writ petition, underscoring that judicial intervention should be limited when alternative remedies exist. The petitioner was granted liberty to seek redressal through the appropriate appellate authorities and the Appellate Tribunal. en-us Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367942 The High Court held that the petitioner's request for continuation of a concessional rate of basic customs duty under Notification No. 46/2011 was not eligible as the withdrawal was deliberate, not a mistake. The court emphasized the need for the petitioner to exhaust statutory remedies under the Customs Act, directing them to approach the Appellate Tribunal for adjudication. Stressing the importance of separation of powers, the court dismissed the writ petition, underscoring that judicial intervention should be limited when alternative remedies exist. The petitioner was granted liberty to seek redressal through the appropriate appellate authorities and the Appellate Tribunal. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367942