Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (9) TMI 913

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R Per Madhu Mohan Damodhar Shri G. Krishnamurthy, the appellant herein, was rendering taxable services under the categories of Commercial and Industrial Construction Service, Business Auxiliary Service and Man Power Recruitment and Supply Agency Service etc. On intelligence that appellant has not discharged service tax liability under these categories of services rendered by him, he was require....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....amounting to Rs. 3,08,926/- along with interest and imposition of various penalties under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Act. In adjudication, the original authority confirmed the proposals made in the SCN. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the order of the original authority in toto. Hence this appeal. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, on behalf of the appellant, Ld. Couns....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....facture of goods. The appellant has paid service tax for the period subsequent to the amendment of the section to cover "persons" also as service providers. 3. On the other hand, Ld. DR, Shri A. Cletus, ADC, supported the findings of the lower authorities. 4. Heard both sides and have gone through the facts. 5.1 On perusal of the Hon'ble Apex Court decision in L & T Ltd., (Supra) relied on by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....orrectly classifiable under BAS and liable for payment of service tax. We are unable to find any infirmity with upholding of this finding by the lower appellate authority. 5.3 Coming to the issue of penalties, we find that the penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority under Section 77 & 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, have been upheld by the lower appellate authority. In our view, however, it ....