https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367177 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the demand under Commercial and Industrial Construction Service (CICS) and penalties, while upholding the demand under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) for the relevant period. Penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were set aside due to the unsustainable nature of a significant portion of the demand under CICS and the confusion surrounding the taxability of job work as a manufacturing process. en-us Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Sep 2018 07:38:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367177 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the demand under Commercial and Industrial Construction Service (CICS) and penalties, while upholding the demand under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) for the relevant period. Penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were set aside due to the unsustainable nature of a significant portion of the demand under CICS and the confusion surrounding the taxability of job work as a manufacturing process. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367177