2018 (9) TMI 582
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....- -<br>Service Tax<br>Mrs. J. Nisha Banu J. For the Petitioners : Mr. P. Radhakrishnan For the Respondent 1, 2, 3 : Mr. R. Arvindan And Mr. K. Govindarajan COMMON ORDER As the issue involved in all the three Writ Petitions are one and the same, the cases are taken up for disposal by a Common Order. 2. In W.P(MD).No.9717 of 2012, the writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rd of Excise and Customs. 4. In W.P(MD).No.14022 of 2011, the writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent in C.No.V/ST/15/108/2011 - ST adjn NCS No.25 of 2011 - ST and quash the proceedings dated 18.10.2011 issued therein, besides directing the second and third respondents who are Government of India Enterprise to....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the materials available on record. 7. This Court, by order dated 02.09.2010 passed in W.P.Nos.19510 to 19512 of 2010, has held as follows: "2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that subsequent to the issuance of summons, a circular No.123/5/2010 was issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, dated 24.5.2010 and in view of the issuance of the said Circular, thou....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er in the matter. The petitioners are directed to submit their objections/reply within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the first respondent is directed to consider the objections and proceed with the matter and pass final orders, within a period of eight (8)weeks, from the date of receipt of objections from the petitioners." 8. In the light of the afor....


TaxTMI