https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366846 The proceedings were not quashed on merits; instead, the HC directed the respondent authority to consider the petitioners' objections and reply before continuing the matter. The authority was required to bear in mind the clarifications in Circular No. 123/5/2010-TRU dated 24.05.2010 and proceed in accordance with that circular. The directions were issued following the earlier order treating the matters as covered by the same approach, so the disputed proceedings were left open for reconsideration by the authority on the basis of the objections and circular. en-us Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Sep 2018 11:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366846 The proceedings were not quashed on merits; instead, the HC directed the respondent authority to consider the petitioners' objections and reply before continuing the matter. The authority was required to bear in mind the clarifications in Circular No. 123/5/2010-TRU dated 24.05.2010 and proceed in accordance with that circular. The directions were issued following the earlier order treating the matters as covered by the same approach, so the disputed proceedings were left open for reconsideration by the authority on the basis of the objections and circular. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366846