Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (9) TMI 23

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nalization of remand proceedings, refund claim cannot be entertained. 2. The facts of the case are that on 20.10.2007 an investigation was conducted in the factory premises of the appellant on the information received that the appellant is engaged in activity of clandestine clearance of Pan Masala, Khaini, Gutka etc. manufactured by them and evading payment on duty. On 20.10.2007, the appellant submitted six cheques of the amount of Rs. 13,41,65,685/- to the visiting officers out of that three cheques for Rs. 8,00,00,000/- were encashed and Rs. 3,45,474/- was deposited by the appellant through PLA. Thereafter, on 31.03.2009, a show cause notice was issued to demand a sum of Rs. 13,41,65,685/- on basis of the slips recovered from the person....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Pvt. Limited vs. Union of India 2017 (350) ELT 145 (Del.). He further submitted that as on date, there is no confirmed demand and after the remand order of the Tribunal dated 08.11.2016 no adjudication took place, therefore, the Revenue cannot retain the amount forever without adjudication. In that circumstances, the refund claim is to be allowed. 4. On the other hand, the Ld. AR supported the impugned order and submits that as the adjudication is still pending, therefore, refund claims are pre-mature and at the best, this Tribunal can direct the adjudicating authority to adjudicate the matter within time frame work. As in case, if any liability arises in adjudication, the same can be appropriated. 5. Heard the parties and considered the....