<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 23 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366287</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to refund the amount of Rs. 8,15,34,612/- to the appellant within three weeks from the judgment date, emphasizing the necessity for timely adjudication and adherence to legal procedures. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, highlighting the duty of the adjudicating authority to act promptly post-remand and the inability of the Revenue to withhold the amount without proper authority or adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:38:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 23 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366287</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to refund the amount of Rs. 8,15,34,612/- to the appellant within three weeks from the judgment date, emphasizing the necessity for timely adjudication and adherence to legal procedures. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, highlighting the duty of the adjudicating authority to act promptly post-remand and the inability of the Revenue to withhold the amount without proper authority or adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>