2018 (9) TMI 13

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) for Appellant Shri Rajeev Ranjan (Addl. Commr.) AR for Respondent ORDER Per: Ashok Jindal The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein differential duty has been demanded from the appellant. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellant is a manufacturer of Acid Slurry. During the impugned period, the appellants were supplying this Acid Slurry to their sister un....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, therefore impugned order is to be set aside. 4. Heard the parties. 5. Considering the fact in appellant's own case for the earlier period, this Tribunal has held that appellant is not required to pay duty under Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules 2000. We, therefore, hold that appellant has not required to pay the duty as demanded in the impugned....