<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 13 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366277</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside an order demanding a differential duty on Acid Slurry supplied to a sister unit, ruling that the appellant was not required to pay duty under Rule 8 of Valuation Rules, 2000 based on a previous decision. Additionally, the sister unit was found entitled to Cenvat credit, resulting in no duty payable by the appellant. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:13:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 13 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366277</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside an order demanding a differential duty on Acid Slurry supplied to a sister unit, ruling that the appellant was not required to pay duty under Rule 8 of Valuation Rules, 2000 based on a previous decision. Additionally, the sister unit was found entitled to Cenvat credit, resulting in no duty payable by the appellant. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>