2018 (8) TMI 1426

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of law: "[I] Undisclosed investment on account of Umiya Land. (i) Whether on facts the case and in law, Appellate Tribunal is correct in allowing credit of undisclosed income already detected in search u/s 132 of Act and subsequently declared by Bachubhai and his son Shri Ajit B Chauhan Rs. 33.16 lacs in respect of Umiya Land. (ii) Whether on facts the case and in law, Appellate Tribunal is correct in allowing credit of undisclosed income declared by the Shyam Group before Settlement Commission although the applications of Shyam Group except M/s Shyam Organizers were abated by the Settlement Commission u/s.245HA of the Act. [II] Undisclosed Investment in Land at Nava Naroda (Karnavati): (i) Whether on facts the case and in la....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hether on facts the case and in law, Appellate Tribunal is correct in allowing credit of undisclosed income already detected in search u/s 132 of Act and subsequently declared under VDIS 97 by Shri Asvinbhai B. Patel Rs. 26,85,075/and Shri Bachhubhai Rs. 21,68,171/in respect of Vastral land, to the assessee? (iii) Whether on facts the case and in law, Appellate Tribunal is correct in allowing credit of undisclosed income detected in search u/s 132 of Act and subsequently declared by the assessee before Settlement Commission although the application of the assessee was abated by the Settlement Commission u/s245HA of the Act? (iv) Whether on facts the case and in law, Appellate Tribunal is correct in relying on a bald affidavit of Shri ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on and subsequently declared by the assessee before Settlement Commission although the application of the assessee was abated by the Settlement Commission u/s 245HA of the Act? (e) Unexplained expenditure/Payments Whether on facts the case and in law, Appellate Tribunal is correct in granting the relief in the case of assessee based on block assessment of Shri Kantibhai Patel when appeal against the block assessment order of Shri Kantibhai is still pending before Appellate Tribunal vide appeal no.IT(SS)A No. 142/A/2011? (f) Addition on account of Cash Payments to Shri Kantibhai Rs. 16 lacs & Rs. 13 lacs. Whether on facts the case and in law, Appellate Tribunal is correct in granting the relief of Rs. 29,00,000/in the case of ass....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....income invested in lands has already been deleted ? (j) Addition on account of cash payment of Rs. 45,03,516/in A Y 199798 and also of Rs. 75,34,840/in A Y 199798. (i) Whether on facts the case and in law, Appellate Tribunal is correct in allowing credit of addition made on account of unexplained investment on lands which was already deleted in very same order, it would not tantamount to double relief to the assessee against the addition on account of cash payment of Rs. 45,03,516/to Shri Kantibhai in A Y 199798 and also of Rs. 75,34,840/to Shri Ashwinbhai in A Y 199798, whether these findings are perverse or not ? (ii) Whether on facts the case and in law, relief of Rs. 45,03,516/in A Y 199798 and also of Rs. 75,34,840/in A Y 1997....