Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (8) TMI 1385

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: Ashok Jindal: Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order wherein cenvat credit has been allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for service tax paid to the commission agent who affected their sales outside India under reverse charge mechanism. 2. The case of the Revenue is that relying on the decision of the Gujarat High Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-II vs. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o whether the respondent-assessee is entitled to avail cenvat credit on commission paid to the commission agent who affected the sale on behalf of the respondent. 6. The said issue has been settled by the Tribunal in the case of Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Ltd.(supra), after considering the decision in the case of Cadila Healthcare Ltd. (supra) and Ambika Overseas reported as 2011 (07) LCX 0196 by....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ction 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994 which defines the Business Auxiliary Service. While examining the definition of Business Auxiliary Service, where the agent is engaged in either promotion or marketing or where sale of goods produced or provided by or belonging to the appellant, the Hon'ble High Court has considered the issue of sales promotion and has not considered the issue of marketing or ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eshwari Solvent Extraction Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur reported at 2014 (299) E.L.T. 116 (Tri. Mumbai) wherein it has been held that if there are contrary view of the Apex Court, in that circumstance the Adjudicating Authority is independent to take any view on merits of the case. Therefore, I am taking independent view and relying on the decision of this Tribunal in the cas....