<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1385 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order allowing the respondent-assessee to avail cenvat credit on commission paid to the commission agent for sales made on its behalf. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of relevant case laws, including previous rulings and independent assessment by the Tribunal. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and cross objections were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 06:37:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1385 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order allowing the respondent-assessee to avail cenvat credit on commission paid to the commission agent for sales made on its behalf. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of relevant case laws, including previous rulings and independent assessment by the Tribunal. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and cross objections were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>