Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (8) TMI 946

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....claim of rebate. They also manufacture CTC machinery for cutting and rolling of tea falling under Tariff Heading 8438 8040. The above machinery is exempted vide Notification No. 6/2006-CE dated 1.3.2006 (Sl. No.10). The appellants were availing exemption on the goods from March 2006 onwards. However, for an interim period from 1.5.2009 to 26.2.2010, there was no exemption available to the goods. The appellant continued to clear the goods availing the exemption. Hence show cause notice was issued proposing to demand duty of Rs. 5,44,260/- along with interest and also for imposing penalties. After due process of law, the original authority confirmed the demand along with interest and imposed penalty of Rs. 50,000/- under Rule 25 of Central Ex....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant. The appellants would be able to produce the purchase invoices as well as the invoices and establish that the goods were not manufactured but were only traded. 3. The ld. AR Shri L. Nanda Kumar supported the findings in the impugned order. He adverted to Notification 12/2010 dated 27.2.2010 and stated that it is specifically provided in the said notification that the exemption extended will not apply to the date prior to 27.2.2010 and after 31.3.2011. Therefore, the appellants are not eligible for the goods cleared for the period 1.5.2009 to 26.2.2010. The contention of the appellant that they have not manufactured the goods is only an afterthought. When the show cause notice has been issued they had cleared the goods by availing....