https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365474 The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the order to only set aside the penalty while upholding the demand for duty and interest based on the facts presented. The Tribunal found the penalty imposed under Rule 25 unjustified and set it aside, concluding that remanding the matter for further examination was unnecessary. The invoices indicated the goods were as per the appellant's specifications, contradicting the claim of being bought-out items. en-us Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Aug 2018 17:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365474 The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the order to only set aside the penalty while upholding the demand for duty and interest based on the facts presented. The Tribunal found the penalty imposed under Rule 25 unjustified and set it aside, concluding that remanding the matter for further examination was unnecessary. The invoices indicated the goods were as per the appellant's specifications, contradicting the claim of being bought-out items. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365474