2016 (12) TMI 1732

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... -<br>Indian Laws<br>K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J. JUDGMENT The petitioner was aggrieved with the non consideration of license applications, filed at Exts.P26 and P27, respectively for a quarry and a crusher, the remittance of fees, for which, is evidenced by Exts.P26 (a) and P27(a). 2. The petitioner&#39;s application for D&O license for a quarry cannot, obviously, be now proceeded with, since t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cuments, which indicate that the petitioner is not entitled to claim the benefit of the deeming provision. A decision was taken by the Panchayat by Resolution No.9 dated 25.02.2016, as evidenced at Annexure R1(a). The order was also communicated to the petitioner by registered acknowledgment due letter, as seen from Annexure R1 (b). True, there is a difference in the initials of the petitioner and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....such circumstance, the attempt of the petitioner was to deliberately refuse the registered cover and then claim benefit of the deeming provision. This Court is unable to countenance such a contention. 5. The petitioner has a further contention that the rejection order at Annexure R1(c) refers to an application dated 08.02.2016 and his application produced at Ext. P26 is dated 02.02.2016. The sa....