https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274266 A deemed licence under Section 236 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act could not be claimed where the applicant deliberately avoided service of the Panchayat's communication and then relied on the deeming provision. The Court also noted that the petitioner's own documents showed the crusher-unit application date as 08.02.2016, making the contrary assertion misleading. In these circumstances, the writ petition was treated as lacking bona fides, and exclusion of time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act was not available on that basis. The petitioner was left to pursue the alternate remedy, subject to limitation, and the Panchayat's action remained undisturbed. en-us Sat, 17 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Aug 2018 08:25:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274266 A deemed licence under Section 236 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act could not be claimed where the applicant deliberately avoided service of the Panchayat's communication and then relied on the deeming provision. The Court also noted that the petitioner's own documents showed the crusher-unit application date as 08.02.2016, making the contrary assertion misleading. In these circumstances, the writ petition was treated as lacking bona fides, and exclusion of time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act was not available on that basis. The petitioner was left to pursue the alternate remedy, subject to limitation, and the Panchayat's action remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 17 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274266