TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2017 (1) TMI 1604
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he Respondent JUDGMENT Per V. Padmanabhan The appeals are directed against the Order-in-Appeal dated 26.07.2012. The appellant is a manufacturer of "Medicines" falling under Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It was noticed by the Department that the appellant in the month of December, 2007 had failed to deposit an amount of Rs. 13,38,000/- within the last date. Accordingly, the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e appellant. Aggrieved by this order, the appellant approached to the Commissioner (Appeals), who upheld the order passed by the Original Authority. Hence, the present appeals. 2. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that the duty sought to be paid in cash has already been paid using the Cenvat credit account. Such payment of duty using the Cenvat credit has been considered as proper payment of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Vs Union of India vii. Final Order No. A/54380/2016 Ex(DB) dated 21.10.16 GEI Industrial Systems Ltd. Vs. CCE, Bhopal. 3. Ld DR reiterates the Impugned order. 4. I find that the issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra and decided by various High Courts as well as in several decisions of the Tribunal, in favour of the appellant. In the Final Order No. A/53740/2016-SM(BR) of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....yable for the month of August 2008 was not paid by the appellant within the time limit allowed but was paid alongwith interest after delay in the month of November 2008. The question for decision is whether the duty amount to the tune of about Rs. 12 lakhs already paid by the appellant by making use of Cenvat Credit needs to be demanded to be paid in cash/PLA, as has been done by the authori....