https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274223 The Tribunal set aside the demand for payment of Excise duty, interest, and penalties imposed on a medicine manufacturer for failure to deposit the amount within the specified time frame. It ruled in favor of the appellant, citing previous decisions supporting the proper payment of duty through a Cenvat credit account and declaring Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 unconstitutional. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, providing consequential relief based on the decisions of various High Courts and the unconstitutionality of the rule in question. en-us Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Aug 2018 07:56:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274223 The Tribunal set aside the demand for payment of Excise duty, interest, and penalties imposed on a medicine manufacturer for failure to deposit the amount within the specified time frame. It ruled in favor of the appellant, citing previous decisions supporting the proper payment of duty through a Cenvat credit account and declaring Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 unconstitutional. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, providing consequential relief based on the decisions of various High Courts and the unconstitutionality of the rule in question. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274223