2018 (8) TMI 132

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appellant ORDER K. M. Joseph, C.J. ( Oral ) In this Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, the Revenue calls in question the order of the Tribunal, by which the Tribunal has affirmed the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), in turn, has deleted addition of Rs. 75,16,013/-. The Assessee, it appears, filed the r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ase his business so as to get less profit and, therefore, the explanation of the Assessee was rejected and addition was made in a sum of Rs. 75,16,013/-. It is this addition, which has been deleted by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), in fact, noted that the Assessing Officer has not brought on record a single instance of expenses not being vouched....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....A.O. out of "Project Monitoring Expenses" and "Erection and Commissioning Charges" ignoring the fact that the assessee failed to specify the reason of less profit before the A.O. in the year under consideration although turnover went up substantially as compared to previous year? 2. Whether the Hon'ble ITAT, Delhi has erred in law and on the facts by deleting the disallowance of Rs. 75,16....