<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 132 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364660</link>
    <description>The appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act challenged the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of Rs. 75,16,013 to the Assessee&#039;s income due to increased expenses and reduced profit. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) reversed this addition, highlighting the lack of evidence supporting improper expenses. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision. The Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial legal question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 07:51:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 132 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364660</link>
      <description>The appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act challenged the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of Rs. 75,16,013 to the Assessee&#039;s income due to increased expenses and reduced profit. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) reversed this addition, highlighting the lack of evidence supporting improper expenses. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision. The Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial legal question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>