Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (8) TMI 93

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cts of the case are that the appellant were engaged in the manufacture of Pan Masala and Pan Masala containing tobacco (Gutkha) falling under Tariff Item No.21069020 & 24039990 of First Schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 respectively. The appellant were paying Central Excise duty under Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of duty) Rules, 2008. The appellant filed declaration dated 09.07.2008 with the Jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise and declared that they had 20 pouch packing machines, out of which 14 machines were declared for packing of Gutkha bearing brand name 'Raj Darbar' with MRP Rs. 1 and 6 machines were declared for packing Pan Masala (Raj Darbar of MRP Rs. 1.00). On 08.0....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ds should not be confiscated and why Central Excise duty of Rs. 62,50,000/- on said 5 undeclared pouch packing machines should not be demanded for the month of July, 2008 and why penalty should not be imposed. On contest the said show cause notice was adjudicated through the impugned Order-in-Original wherein the Original Authority had confirmed the demand and ordered to confiscate the said seized goods and imposed a redemption fine of Rs. 1 lakh. Further, penalty of Rs. 62,50,000/- was imposed on appellant under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Aggrieved by the said order, appellant is before this Tribunal. 3. Heard the learned Counsel for appellant. He has submitted that there were 20 declared pouch packing machines in the....