<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 93 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364621</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the demand for Central Excise duty amounting to Rs. 62,50,000, as it was solely based on a confessional statement without sufficient evidence. Consequently, the penalty was also dismissed. Additionally, the confiscation of goods, including unbranded Gutkha and packing material, was deemed invalid, leading to the allowance of the appeal in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was entitled to consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 07:49:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 93 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364621</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the demand for Central Excise duty amounting to Rs. 62,50,000, as it was solely based on a confessional statement without sufficient evidence. Consequently, the penalty was also dismissed. Additionally, the confiscation of goods, including unbranded Gutkha and packing material, was deemed invalid, leading to the allowance of the appeal in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was entitled to consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>