2018 (7) TMI 104

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... S. Govindarajan, AC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER Per Bench The issue involved in both the appeals being the same they are heard together and are disposed of by this common order. 2. On behalf of the appellant, Ld. Counsel, Ms. Ginita Bodani appeared and argued the matter. 3. The brief facts are that the appellant filed refund claims for refund of SAD. in terms of the Notification No. 102/....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es and the appellant have discharged VAT on the goods. This is clear from the invoices and therefore the decision of the authorities below that the appellant has not sold the goods and not discharged VAT on these goods cannot sustain. It was also submitted by her that the Tribunal's decision in the appellant's own case was upheld by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the very same issu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d by the Ld. Counsel for the appellants. On the invoices the description of the goods is shown as STB, wherein the Ld. Counsel has explained that this is an abbreviation of Set Top Box. She explained that goods have been transferred with right to use falling under deemed sale Further, in the appellant's own case, the issue stands decided by the Delhi Tribunal wherein it has been held that tran....