<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 104 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362796</link>
    <description>Refund of special additional duty under the relevant notification cannot be denied where the transfer of goods is on a right-to-use basis amounting to deemed sale and VAT has been discharged accordingly. The objection that the invoices lacked the precise endorsement against Cenvat credit also failed because the invoices stated that credit was not passed on and no material showed any credit had been availed or transferred. On these facts, the refund claim satisfied the statutory conditions and was held eligible for refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:25:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 104 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362796</link>
      <description>Refund of special additional duty under the relevant notification cannot be denied where the transfer of goods is on a right-to-use basis amounting to deemed sale and VAT has been discharged accordingly. The objection that the invoices lacked the precise endorsement against Cenvat credit also failed because the invoices stated that credit was not passed on and no material showed any credit had been availed or transferred. On these facts, the refund claim satisfied the statutory conditions and was held eligible for refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>