Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1927 (5) TMI 3

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years including three months' solitary confinement. The case for the prosecution is thus stated by Jai Bhagwan. Two or three days before the 18th August 1926, the appellant brought two old silver coins to him and sold them to him at nine annas each. Nest day he brought two more silver coins of the same type and these were also purchased by Ja....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ul Aziz who has a druggist's shop at Karnal. This witness went to the police station and brought with him Sardar Bishen Singh, sub-inspector, who took down Jai Bhagwan's statement. The sub-inspector directed Jai Bhagwan to go to his shop and to wait for another opportunity when the accused would come to him. The accused came again to him at 4-30 or 5 p.m. the same day and asked him to go w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to Jai Bhagwan on that date were not silver coins but contained mixture of lead and zinc. The appellant was arrested and sent up for trial under S. 420, I.P.C. The learned sessions judge found that the acts of the appellant would not fall under S. 420 but that it was a clear case of attempt to cheat. He accordingly convicted him under S. 420/511. The appellant has appealed from jail. I have gone ....