<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1927 (5) TMI 3 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273555</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the appellant&#039;s conviction for attempting to cheat under Section 420/511 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court found that the appellant&#039;s actions constituted a clear attempt to deceive the victim by selling fake silver coins, establishing the offense of attempt to cheat. Emphasizing the requirement of an external act indicating progress towards the commission of the offense, the Court upheld the conviction based on legal precedents and the evidence presented, concluding that the sentence imposed was appropriate. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the appellant&#039;s guilt in the attempted cheating scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 15:46:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1927 (5) TMI 3 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273555</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the appellant&#039;s conviction for attempting to cheat under Section 420/511 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court found that the appellant&#039;s actions constituted a clear attempt to deceive the victim by selling fake silver coins, establishing the offense of attempt to cheat. Emphasizing the requirement of an external act indicating progress towards the commission of the offense, the Court upheld the conviction based on legal precedents and the evidence presented, concluding that the sentence imposed was appropriate. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the appellant&#039;s guilt in the attempted cheating scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>