Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (6) TMI 7

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ate for the appellant Sh. H. C. Saini, AR for the respondent ORDER Per : Archana Wadhwa Both the appeals are taken up for hearing and are being disposed of by a common order as they arise out of the same impugned order passed by the authorities below. 2. As per facts on record, the appellant are engaged in the manufacture of S.S. Billets and S.S. Flats and steel castings etc. fallin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....discrepancy in the stock of raw material was detected. 3. Based upon the above facts, proceedings were initiated resulting in confiscation of the said seized goods with an option to the appellant to redeem the same on payment of redemption fine of Rs. 25 lakhs. In addition, penalty of Rs. 14,54,224/- was imposed upon the appellant under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules alongwith imposition o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....orised Signatory having explained the reasons for non entry of some of the goods, being hollow billets reflects upon the appellant's bonafide. Further, there is no evidence with the Revenue to show that the said goods were not entered in the statutory record with intention to remove the same clandestinely. In such a scenario, there is no justification for confiscation of the goods and imposition o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s, cannot be held to be reflecting the correct stock position. Reference can be made to the Tribunal decision in the case of Raman Ispat (P) Ltd. vs. CCE&ST, Meerut- 2016 (336) ELT 688 (Tri. All.), Shree Ganesh Alloys vs. CCE, Chandigarh - 2016 (337) ELT 595 (Tri. Chan.) as also in A. Kumar Industries vs. CCE&C, Daman, Vapi -2010 (261) ELT 486 (Tri. Ahmd.). Further, it is seen that the decision....