<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 7 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361180</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing both appeals in favor of the appellants due to the lack of evidence supporting the suspicion of clandestine removal and the inaccuracies in the stock position determination based on average weight without inventories.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 7 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361180</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing both appeals in favor of the appellants due to the lack of evidence supporting the suspicion of clandestine removal and the inaccuracies in the stock position determination based on average weight without inventories.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>