Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (5) TMI 1623

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....thi, Joint Commissioner (AR) : For the Respondent ORDER The present appeal has been filed against the Order-in-Original No. 13/2008 dated 28.08.2008. The appellant is a STPI unit working under the provisions of Customs Notification 52/2003 dated 31.03.2003 and connected Notifications. The unit has obtained in-bond manufacturing sanction order and private bonded warehouse license to carry out the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....006. However, the Department subsequently, issued show-cause notice for demand and appropriation of the said amount which resulted in passing of the impugned order in which, in addition to appropriating the Customs duty paid, the imported goods were also ordered for confiscation and allowed for redemption on payment of redemption fine. Penalty was also imposed on the appellant under provisions of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d that the appellant was not required to pay the duty even though the same has been paid. He further submitted that there was no case for confiscation of such goods. 4.  The learned DR justified the impugned order. She submitted that goods which were not put to use had become obsolete. She further submitted that since the goods had been de-bonded by appellant on payment of duty, the appellan....