<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1623 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361059</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty payment made by the appellant on obsolete goods but set aside the confiscation of imported goods and the penalty imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act. The decision was based on the findings that the goods were within the appellant&#039;s premises during verification, and the duty payment was justified despite the goods being obsolete. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal and modified the impugned order accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1623 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361059</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty payment made by the appellant on obsolete goods but set aside the confiscation of imported goods and the penalty imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act. The decision was based on the findings that the goods were within the appellant&#039;s premises during verification, and the duty payment was justified despite the goods being obsolete. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal and modified the impugned order accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>