Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (4) TMI 1112

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....araman, Advocate for the Appellant Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, JC (AR) for the Respondent Per Bench Brief facts are that the appellants had filed a refund application pursuant to appeal order C.Cus. No. 949/2012 dated 22.8.2012 for the refund of an amount of Rs. 2,38,24,418/- being the CVD with applicable education cess on import of goods vide Bill of Entry dated 4.7.2011. In the refund ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s to non-availment of credit. Therefore, refund claim cannot be rejected on the ground that the appellant has availed credit. To support this argument, he relied upon the following case laws:- a. Girijapathi Reddy & Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise - 2016 (344) ELT 923 b. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise - 2016 (44) STR 136 c. Mangal Textile Pvt. Ltd. Vs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....edit, the authorities below ought to have directed for verification of the same and granted refund. 4. The ld. AR Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy reiterated the findings in the impugned order. He submitted that the appellant had given wrong declaration stating that they have not availed credit. Only when the availment of credit was brought to their notice, they contended to be have reversed it subseq....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ame. At the time of hearing, the ld. counsel for appellant has submitted that the appellant reversed the credit availed by them in October 2013 itself. That though the same was brought to the notice of the authorities below, the refund sanctioning authority proceeded to reject the refund stating that the appellant has availed CENVAT credit. Thereafter, appellants had issued a letter to the jurisdi....