https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359001 The Tribunal remanded a case involving a refund application for CVD on imported goods, rejected due to availing CENVAT credit. The appellant claimed to have reversed the credit before utilization, supported by relevant case laws. Despite lack of jurisdictional authority response, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the rejection. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's claim but emphasized the need for verification. Consequently, the matter was remanded for verification of credit reversal, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority. en-us Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Apr 2018 07:06:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359001 The Tribunal remanded a case involving a refund application for CVD on imported goods, rejected due to availing CENVAT credit. The appellant claimed to have reversed the credit before utilization, supported by relevant case laws. Despite lack of jurisdictional authority response, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the rejection. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's claim but emphasized the need for verification. Consequently, the matter was remanded for verification of credit reversal, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359001