Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (3) TMI 769

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lant None for respondent Per: Ramesh Nair Revenue filed the present appeal against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the Commissioner (Appeals) dropped the demand for the extended period being time barred, only on the basis of a letter dated 16.10.2008. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) contended that on the basis of this letter, the department was in knowl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erusal of the records, we find that the Commissioner (Appeals)'s finding for dropping of demand for the extended period is only on the basis of a letter dated 16.10.2008. However, this very letter was not produced before the original authority. Therefore, the fact regarding submission of this letter and the genuineness thereof was not verified. Even the learned Commissioner (Appeals) also has not ....