https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357066 The Revenue's appeal challenging the dropping of demand for the extended period as time-barred, based solely on an unverified letter dated 16.10.2008, was successful. The Tribunal found the decision to drop the demand on this basis to be incorrect and unlawful, as the letter was not submitted for verification before the original authority. The case was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for proper verification of the crucial letter, emphasizing the need for a fresh decision on the time-barred demand. en-us Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:00:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357066 The Revenue's appeal challenging the dropping of demand for the extended period as time-barred, based solely on an unverified letter dated 16.10.2008, was successful. The Tribunal found the decision to drop the demand on this basis to be incorrect and unlawful, as the letter was not submitted for verification before the original authority. The case was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for proper verification of the crucial letter, emphasizing the need for a fresh decision on the time-barred demand. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357066