2018 (3) TMI 646
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Adv. for UOI RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL) CM No.8687/2018 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P. (C) 2098/2018 & CM No.8686/2018 2. Issue notice. Mr. Ajay Digpaul who appears for respondents accepts notice. 2.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners says that the issue which arises for consideration in this case is covered by the judgment of another Single Judge of this Co....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the petitioners submitted that VSTS and IAPL had not been carrying on business for more than three years. 4. Counsel for the petitioners says that since the petitioners do not wish to revive VSTS and IAPL they would take steps under Section 248 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in Sandeep Singh (supra). 5. Furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says tha....