<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 646 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356943</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to comply with the previous judgment&#039;s directives, requiring the petitioners to take steps under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, and benefit from the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018, within ten days. The impugned list concerning the petitioners will remain stayed until 31.3.2018 or until the respondents decide on the petitioners&#039; requests. The Registrar of Companies will activate the petitioners&#039; DIN and DSC, closing the related application accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 09:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 646 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356943</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to comply with the previous judgment&#039;s directives, requiring the petitioners to take steps under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, and benefit from the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018, within ten days. The impugned list concerning the petitioners will remain stayed until 31.3.2018 or until the respondents decide on the petitioners&#039; requests. The Registrar of Companies will activate the petitioners&#039; DIN and DSC, closing the related application accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>