2018 (2) TMI 1406

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Per: B. Ravichandran The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 30.03.2010 of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Madurai. 2. The appellants are engaged in construction activities. The main dispute in the present appeal relates to their claim to discharge service tax on abated value in terms of Notification No.15/2004-ST dated 10.09.2004 and No.1/2006-ST dated 01.03.2006, with refe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al is with reference to eligibility of the appellant to pay tax on cum-tax value for the period 10.09.2004 to 30.09.2005. The impugned order remanded the matter to the original authority for a re-calculation of tax liability after allowing such benefit. The Ld. Counsel submitted that they have certain issue over and above the dispute of cum-tax benefit. He prayed for permission to raise on all poi....