https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355985 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding in favor of the appellants on both issues. It held that the value of materials supplied free of cost should not be included in the taxable consideration for service tax purposes, supporting the abatement claim. Additionally, it directed a re-examination of the tax liability concerning the cum-tax value matter, emphasizing a comprehensive reassessment of all relevant points during the remand proceedings. en-us Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2018 06:40:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355985 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding in favor of the appellants on both issues. It held that the value of materials supplied free of cost should not be included in the taxable consideration for service tax purposes, supporting the abatement claim. Additionally, it directed a re-examination of the tax liability concerning the cum-tax value matter, emphasizing a comprehensive reassessment of all relevant points during the remand proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355985