2018 (2) TMI 587
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....avan, Asst. Commr (AR) Per: Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra: The present appeal is filed against order-in-original No. 58/2009 dated 02.04.2009. 2. Brief facts of the case are that in August 1996, the appellant had imported Dyed Woven Fabrics availing benefit under Notification No. 106/95-Cus extended to imports with a condition of re-export of the final product. The fabric was impor....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ibunal had, vide its order dated 01.09.2004, remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for retesting of the sample. The adjudicating authority, observing that the dispute is too old and that sample was not traceable even after substantial efforts, reconfirmed the demands. 5. From the above it appears that the test results cannot be validated by subsequent retest on resubmissio....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI